<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ramblin&#039; Fan &#187; 8th Circuit Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ramblinfan.com/tag/8th-circuit-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ramblinfan.com</link>
	<description>A St. Louis Rams Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:00:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rams&#8217; Coaches &#8216;Surprised&#8217; By Brief</title>
		<link>http://ramblinfan.com/2011/06/02/rams-coaches-surprised-by-brief/</link>
		<comments>http://ramblinfan.com/2011/06/02/rams-coaches-surprised-by-brief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 08:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Stine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billy Devaney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lockout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL Coaches Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Rams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ramblinfan.com/?p=2633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>News broke last week the the NFL Coaches Association filed a brief with the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals siding with the players in the current labor issue, but apparently all of the league&#8217;s coaches weren&#8217;t consulted. Since the filing, several teams have come out and said they were not informed that the brief would [...]</p><p><a href="http://ramblinfan.com/2011/06/02/rams-coaches-surprised-by-brief/">Rams&#8217; Coaches &#8216;Surprised&#8217; By Brief</a> - <a href="http://ramblinfan.com">Ramblin&#039; Fan</a> - <a href="http://ramblinfan.com">Ramblin&#039; Fan - A St. Louis Rams Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>News broke last week the the NFL Coaches Association filed a brief with the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals siding with the players in the current labor issue, but apparently all of the league&#8217;s coaches weren&#8217;t consulted. Since the filing, several teams have come out and said they were not informed that the brief would be filed and that they do not agree with what it contained. The Rams are the latest team to do just that, as GM Billy Devaney said today that the coaching staff was &#8220;surprised by this being filed.&#8221; Devaney went on to say that &#8221;they assured me that they weren&#8217;t informed or consulted about it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not exactly sure what to make out of all of this. The Rams are the seventh team to come forward so far in opposition of the brief, which means one of two things is happening here. Either the NFLCA leaders are doing whatever they want without consulting the members, or coaches realized very quickly that the owners, not the players, are the ones who sign their checks. I am firmly on the players&#8217; side, but if I were a coach I wouldn&#8217;t be coming out and saying that publicly. Whatever the case, the coaches association needs to get their situation figured out, because it makes them look awfully bad when they file a brief in court and then several of its members say they had nothing to do with it. This lockout is bad e</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ramblinfan.com/2011/06/02/rams-coaches-surprised-by-brief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court Rules Lockout Still On</title>
		<link>http://ramblinfan.com/2011/05/17/court-rules-lockout-still-on/</link>
		<comments>http://ramblinfan.com/2011/05/17/court-rules-lockout-still-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 09:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Stine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Rams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[8th Circuit Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[appeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judge Susan Richard Nelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lockout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFLPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Rams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ramblinfan.com/?p=2591</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I said last week that multiple sources said the 8th Circuit Appeals Court here in St. Louis probably wouldn&#8217;t rule on the NFL&#8217;s request to stay the ruling of Judge Susan Richard Nelson, and it turns out I was wrong. The court ruled in favor of the league today, meaning the lockout is still on [...]</p><p><a href="http://ramblinfan.com/2011/05/17/court-rules-lockout-still-on/">Court Rules Lockout Still On</a> - <a href="http://ramblinfan.com">Ramblin&#039; Fan</a> - <a href="http://ramblinfan.com">Ramblin&#039; Fan - A St. Louis Rams Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said last week that multiple sources said the 8th Circuit Appeals Court here in St. Louis probably wouldn&#8217;t rule on the NFL&#8217;s request to stay the ruling of Judge Susan Richard Nelson, and it turns out I was wrong. The court ruled in favor of the league today, meaning the lockout is still on and will remain on until either the two sides come to an agreement or until after the court hears the actual appeal sometime in June. This is obviously bad news for the players. The two sides were in mediation today, but it doesn&#8217;t sound like anything will happen there before the court hearing in three weeks.</p>
<p>Nothing is set in stone as far as a final ruling, but this certainly doesn&#8217;t look good for the NFLPA. We thought here all along that the odds were in favor of the league in this appeal, but it looks now as if all signs are pointing to the court ruling in favor of the NFL when they pass judgement in three weeks. There are some who believe that this is actually good for the fans, because they believe it will force the players to give in to certain demands in negotiations. While I want nothing more than this whole issue to be resolved, I feel for the players, and I think they are getting screwed in this whole deal. I&#8217;m on their side, but I have a strong feeling that they aren&#8217;t goi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://ramblinfan.com/2011/05/17/court-rules-lockout-still-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 9/17 queries in 0.033 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 498/533 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: ramblinfan.com @ 2013-05-26 03:47:39 by W3 Total Cache -->